Well, here we are on the verge of plunging the country into massive debt, and for what?
I watched the President's presser last night with interest. He is impressive, no doubt about it, expecially after the eight years of W's fumbling such opportunities to persuade. He is impressive and at the same time more than a bit disturbing.
What disturbed me was the dishonesty. What he and the congressional Democrats are passing of as "stimulus" is little more than forty years of pent up liberal programs that could not pass on their own merits in the ordinary course of legislative business all swept together under the umbrella of this bill and sold as economic relief. The deception is astounding.
Example: health care. Never mind that health care has no place in a stimulus bill as it will not create job one, it is also a foot in the door to government guidelines to treatment and intrusion by the government into the doctor patient relationship. This will start with data bases of of what are known as procedure codes. These have been used for years by insurance companies, Medicare and Medicaid for payment purposes. What is being proposed is to use these codes to get treatment modalities authorized on the basis of efficacy and cost effectiveness as determined by someone in government. As if that were not enough, YOUR treatment codes will be entered in that data base.
This is but one example. What did the President have to say about that last night? What else is in there with regard to global warming? Alternative energy? Education? Goodies for organized labor? What other intrusions on our liberty are buried in this monster?
And for all this, there have been NO hearings on this bill. We must rush it through or the world as we know it will come to an end. Perhaps there is a reason for the rush. Perhaps if folks knew what was really going on they would be up in arms.
In the words of Glenn Beck, "Be afraid, be very afraid."
Here is the article that appeared on Bloomberg yesterday:
Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaugheyCommentary by
Betsy McCaugheyFeb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Republican Senators are questioning whether President Barack Obama’s stimulus bill contains the right mix of tax breaks and cash infusions to jump-start the economy.
Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department.Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because they are dangerous to your health. Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).
The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.
But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the
stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008
book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to
Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo
Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.New PenaltiesHospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)
What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative
Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow
the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are
driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept
“hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises
Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.
Elderly Hardest Hit
Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be
more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them.
That means the elderly will bear the brunt.
Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).
The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly
patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye
before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost
three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision.
If the Obama administration’s economic stimulus bill passes the Senate
in its current form, seniors in the U.S. will face similar rationing. Defenders
of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice
The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and
nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid.
The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy,
Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).
Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to
debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act
quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a
health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too
important to be stalled by Senate protocol.
”More Scrutiny NeededOn Friday, President Obama called it “inexcusable and irresponsible” for senators to delay passing the stimulus bill. In truth, this bill needs more scrutiny.
The health-care industry is the largest employer in the U.S. It produces almost 17
percent of the nation’s gross domestic product. Yet the bill treats health care
the way European governments do: as a cost problem instead of a growth industry.
Imagine limiting growth and innovation in the electronics or auto industry
during this downturn. This stimulus is dangerous to your health and the
(Betsy McCaughey is former lieutenant governor of New York and is an
adjunct senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. The opinions expressed are her
To contact the writer of this column: Betsy McCaughey at Betsymross@aol.com