ARC's 1st Law: As a "progressive" online discussion grows longer, the probability of a nefarious reference to Karl Rove approaches one

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Good question...

Clarice Feldman at American Thinker (and crossposted to the very good analysis at Tom Macguire's blog, Just One Minute) has an interesting article about the recent correspondence between Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald and Libby's counsel:

For if the Special Prosecutor had no evidence that Valerie was a “classified” employee at the CIA why did he even proceed with the investigation? He was selected to determine whether there had been a violation of the law relating to classified information-in this case-the “outing” of a covert agent.

And he proceeded without even seeking to establish whether Plame was one?

Read the whole thing.

It appears that parts of Fitz's Fitzmas presser might have been just wishful thinking.

Your Co-Conspirator,
ARC: Brian