ARC's 1st Law: As a "progressive" online discussion grows longer, the probability of a nefarious reference to Karl Rove approaches one

Friday, January 06, 2006

Punishment Just Doesn't Work

Or "Judge Cashman - A Friend of Pedophiles and Drunk Drivers"

H/T to OpinionJournal's BOTW

Burlington, Vermont -- January 4, 2005

There was outrage Wednesday when a Vermont judge handed out a 60-day jail sentence to a man who raped a little girl many,many times over a four-year span starting when she was seven.

The judge said he no longer believes in punishment and is more concerned about rehabilitation.

Prosecutors argued that confessed child-rapist Mark Hulett, 34, of Williston deserved at least eight years behind bars for repeatedly raping a littler girl countless times starting when she was seven.

But Judge Edward Cashman disagreed explaining that he no longer believes that punishment works.

"The one message I want to get through is that anger doesn't solve anything. It just corrodes your soul," said Judge Edward Cashman speaking to a packed Burlington courtroom. Most of the on-lookers were related to a young girl who was repeatedly raped by Mark Hulett who was in court to be sentenced.


The sex abuse started when the girl was seven and ended when she was ten. Prosecutors were seeking a sentence of eight to twenty years in prison, in part, as punishment.

"Punishment is a valid purpose," Chittenden Deputy Prosecutor Nicole Andreson argued to Judge Edward Cashman.

"The state recognizes that the court may not agree or subscribe to that method of sentencing but the state does. The state thinks that it is a very important factor for the court to consider," Andreson added.

But Judge Cashman explained that he is more concerned that Hulett receive sex offender treatment as rehabilitation. But under Department of Corrections classification, Hulett is considered a low-risk for re-offense so he does not qualify for in-prison treatment.So the judge sentenced him to just 60 days in prison and then Hulett must complete sex treatment when he gets out or face a possible life sentence.

Judge Cashman also also revealed that he once handed down stiff sentences when he first got on the bench 25 years ago, but he no longer believes in punishment.

"I discovered it accomplishes nothing of value;it doesn't make anything better;it costs us a lot of money; we create a lot of expectation, and we feed on anger,"Cashman explained to the people in the court.

The sentence outraged the victim's family who asked not to be identified.

"I don't like it," the victim's mother,in tears, told Channel 3. "He should pay for what he did to my baby and stop it here. She's not even home with me and he can be home for all this time, and do what he did in my house," she added.

Hulett -- who had been out on bail-- was taken away to start his sentence immediately.

Now, I know that Bill O'Reilly has been busy talking up his appearance on the Letterman show, but I think he should consider identify Vermont as a state that's heading in the wrong direction regarding Jessica's Law. For those that aren't aware, Jessica's law would impose a minimum sentence of 25 years and a maximum of life in prison for first-time child sex offenders. I don't know Cashman's political affiliation, but the muddled thinking that he displayed in this case is consistent with the logic and positions of NAMBLA, the ACLU, and others on the "Progressive" Left to focus on "rehabilitation" instead of actual punishment.

I did a quick google search on Judge Edward Cashman and did find that he has imposed strict punishments in the past, including this sentence which went beyond the statutory term - prompting a review by a higher court on appeal. But he also let this drunk driver at the University of Vermont in Burlington go on a technicality, arguing that the UVM police didn't have proper authority.

So, I guess you could say that if you're going to go before Cashman, make sure it's for drunk driving or for raping a child. He's got a soft spot for those offenders.

(In light of his public announcement that he no longer believes in "punishment," would it be safe to say that he's no longer fit to serve as a judge?)

Also see Myopic Zeal, the Anchoress, California Conservative, and The Truth Laid Bear, and Michelle Malkin

Your Co-Conspirator,
ARC: St Wendeler

Comments (8)
Anonymous said...

Who appointed this clown????? If it was Howie Dean the Republicans might want to mention that considering the smear the Dem's are doing on Alito. Perhaps a "Who would you choose for judge?" commercial.

Anonymous said...

want cashman's public eMail---
made PUBLIC,vermont bar,etc...not one damn so-called researched article has any kind of contact and neither do any child advocacy blogs/websites ----SHOULD BE PUBLISHED as a link so all and any motivated can just bang this boob and the vermont bar---am also wondering what's this kornkobS views on nambla etc...
----- urge all to contact ""oprah""
as she is doing all she can to get sexual predators LOCKED UP.

Anonymous said...

Governor Richard Snelling (r) appointed Edward Cashman

Anonymous said...

Why let the judge off scott free? Write, Call, or give him a visit at
Edward J Cashman
29 Lamoille St
Essex Junction, VT 05452-3729
(802) 872-0615

James said...

I request that you please remove the judge's address. While you might just want to snail-mail him well-reasoned arguments, others probably want a brick through his window or worse, especially with all the media coverage.

And it would be sad if that happened, no matter how outrageous the judge's ruling, because any violent act would subvert the democratic processes our country holds dear. So, given that there are pathetic people out there who do stupid things, please remove the address. Posted online, I think it's an implied threat, whether or not that was your intention.

Gino said...

Frankly - his judgement was public and he has to stand in the public eye and scrutiny for his idiocy, not to mention his total lack of caring for the victim(s) in this travesty. Leave his address public - it is public information. Maybe he'll think twice about using his superfluous idealogy on the bench. He needs to be remove from the bench -he is totally incompetent, and out or order. This child's life was undeniably impacted for life and it is NOT his duty or domain to attempt to rehabilitate ANYONE!!! If a stone flies through his window, so be it. Those are personal choices people make, however wise or unwise. However - the stimulation of those incensed by this fake judge's treatment of this felon and predator is also his choice - one that has long lived ramifications for all the victims of this senseless and warped crime. There should be no patience or understanding for the abuse of a child, nor for those who fail to punish the perpetrators of said crime. Get real and stop whining - enlightenment does not mean exposing our children to animals for the betterment of that animal.

Eugenics PI said...

THE INFLUENCE OF SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES

CONTROLLING SEX OFFENDER REENTRY: JESSICA'S LAW MEASURES IN CALIFORNIA

Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration

Please vist my blog for why this matters so much.

http://politicaleugenics.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

Judge Cashman seems to be on the wrong track with his comments that " punishment " does not work.I believe that most of us are concerned far more about protection.Those who have repeatedly shown that they can not live within society should be removed to camps permanently.Camps under video surveillance where they work to provide their own upkeep.